Protections for Gig Economy Workers

Millions of people work in the gig economy on a part- or full-time basis. They drive for rideshare apps like Uber and Lyft, deliver food and packaged goods on delivery apps like Postmates and DoorDash, and pick up odd jobs through labor marketplaces like Thumbtack and Handy.

Most are independent contractors working without formal job protections or employee benefits. Those who work in the gig economy full time typically occupy the lower rungs of the economic ladder, often forgoing health insurance, covering essential job-related expenses like vehicle maintenance and fuel out of pocket, and saving little if any of their net pay.

Part-time gig workers depend on the income to supplement earnings from their day jobs. Those not dependent on gig income to make ends meet still put the money to good use by bolstering their savings or putting money away for long-term goals like education and retirement.

Whether part time or full time, the typical gig worker simply can’t afford to miss multiple consecutive days of work because they’re sick or injured. As independent contractors, they don’t enjoy the basic job security guarantees of the Family and Medical Leave Act, which protects employees who take extended leave for certain covered medical reasons (including childbirth and adoption) from termination during their absence. Even as the biggest gig economy platforms earn billions in annual revenue, they balk at offering such protections to contractors, wary of doing anything that implies contractors function as employees rather than entrepreneurs using gig apps to grow their own microbusinesses.

In the best of times, operating without a financial or legal safety net tests gig workers’ resolve. In worse times, it’s simply untenable for many.

A reckoning of sorts arrived in early 2020 as the world began to grapple with the spread of a highly contagious new novel coronavirus, COVID-19, responsible for an acute respiratory illness many times deadlier than seasonal influenza. COVID-19 is particularly dangerous for older individuals, those with comorbidities like hypertension, and the immunocompromised.

To prepare for the pandemic, governments and private companies are battening down the hatches, slowing the flow of people and goods around the world and raising the risk of a prolonged economic slowdown.

Event cancellations and widespread changes in consumers’ public behavior hit the travel and hospitality sectors particularly hard, threatening the livelihoods of millions of mostly low-wage workers without paid-time-off benefits or the financial capacity to take extended unpaid leave due to illness. Facing immense public pressure, some hospitality firms have taken a leap that was unthinkable months earlier: offering paid sick leave to hourly workers. According to Bloomberg, Olive Garden parent company Darden’s policy was retroactive six months, enough to provide full-timers and veteran part-timers with several days’ leave in the bank.

Pressure to protect sick contractors mounted on gig platforms as well. According to CNBC, rideshare giants Uber and Lyft promised in early March 2020 to compensate drivers affected by the novel coronavirus for up to 14 days. But it wasn’t clear whether the policy would apply only to drivers testing positive for the virus rather than those voluntarily taking off work to reduce infection risk. Drivers reacted coolly to the announcements, arguing that the cash-flush companies could and should do more to support affected workers.

Policymakers could soon force the issue. As public support for stronger gig worker protections grows, the list of policy changes proposed by state and local governments continues to grow. These are the most generous and farthest-reaching proposed and enacted policies. Check back often for updates and additions.

Protections for Gig Economy Workers by State


California has the farthest-reaching labor protections of any state for gig economy workers. The passage of California Assembly Bill 5 (AB5), a sweeping law classifying hundreds of thousands of rideshare drivers and other contingent workers as employees, was a watershed for gig workers.

AB5 officially became law on Jan. 1, 2020. It dramatically expands the definition of traditional employment by presuming all workers to be employees unless they can satisfy all three prongs of the “ABC test” for independent contractor status, according to Nolo. To retain independent contractor status, workers must:

  • Be free from the hiring entity’s control and direction under the terms of their contract and the performance of the work itself
  • Perform work outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business
  • Be customarily engaged in a trade or occupation of the same nature as the work being performed under the contract

To comply with a prior court ruling and avoid chilling California’s labor market, AB5 carved out more than three dozen industry exemptions covering a variety of professional services providers (such as online freelancers like graphic designers and writers), highly paid professionals (such as physicians and attorneys), and certain beauty and personal care professionals (such as barbers).

Gig economy employers, many of whom are based in California, were AB5’s primary targets. Due in part to the high number of carve-outs, the two rideshare giants immediately indicated they’d refuse to abide by the law. Uber and Postmates filed suit to quash the law, though their efforts suffered a major blow in February 2020, when, according to Reuters, a federal judge refused to stop the law from taking effect while the case proceeded.

Since AB5’s passage, California legislators have proposed dozens of modifications and add-ons to the law. Most are Republican-sponsored bills unlikely to make it through the Democratic-controlled California Legislature or win favor with the state’s Democratic governor, according to Bloomberg Law. The Sacramento Bee describes some of these proposals, including Senate Minority Leader Shannon Grove’s “repeal and replace” bill that would supplant AB5’s regime with a much stricter employment test and Assemblyman Kevin Kiley’s proposal to repeal the law without replacing it.

The most interesting Democratic proposal with any chance of passage could enshrine minimum wage protections, workers’ compensation insurance, and portable employment benefits for qualifying gig economy workers, notes Bloomberg Law. Its future is uncertain amid legal wrangling over AB5 and blowback from the business community, however.

New Jersey

A proposal before the New Jersey Legislature would guarantee portable job benefits to thousands of gig workers in the state. Covering rideshare apps, delivery services, and other app-based platforms that rely heavily on contract labor, New Jersey Senate Bill 943 (S943) allows all contractors working for covered companies to opt into the protections, which would include health insurance, paid time off, and tax-advantaged retirement savings.

According to the Courier-Post, Assemblyman Troy Singleton’s proposed law requires app-based “contracting agents” such as Uber and Postmates to contribute the lesser of $6 per worker-hour or 25% of each consumer transaction fee to cover the cost of contractor benefits. These fees help cover the cost of workers’ compensation insurance and any voluntary benefits the worker elected to receive, such as health insurance and paid time off.

Singleton’s proposal is similar to past gig worker protection laws proposed in New Jersey’s 2017 and 2018 legislative sessions. Those efforts ultimately collapsed amid controversy over a sweeping bill that would have penalized companies for misclassifying employees as independent contractors. With no controversial sibling to impede its progress and praise from surprising corners — including a local representative of Postmates — S943 sailed through committee in early 2020 and appears likely to pass in both houses of the New Jersey Legislature. Still, because New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy hasn’t taken a position on Singleton’s bill, its chances of becoming law remain uncertain.

New York State

New York state legislators have yet to introduce gig worker protection, but Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s office is likely to produce a detailed proposal before 2020 is over. According to The Information, Cuomo’s proposal incorporates feedback from at least one industry representative in the hopes of forestalling the legal fights that hampered California’s AB5 rollout.

To start, the New York state proposal is likely to establish collective bargaining rights for gig economy workers, which AB5 didn’t do. The collective bargaining provision is a nod to complaints from rideshare drivers in New York City, where a high minimum wage has curtailed drivers’ hours. A member of Cuomo’s staff indicated to The Information that collective bargaining protections weren’t a red line — meaning they could be left out of the final bill if that’s what it takes for it to reach the governor’s desk.

Whatever happens to the collective bargaining provision and however the bill ends up determining who qualifies as a contractor, the New York state bill is likely to allow qualifying gig workers to opt into portable benefits offered by their preferred benefits provider. That would be a huge deal for the hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers who rely on gig platforms for supplemental or full-time income.

Washington State

Back on the West Coast, the Washington Legislature is considering a gig worker protection bill that combines elements of Singleton’s current proposal with aspects of the controversial bill that scuttled his earlier efforts to enshrine contractor benefits.

Introduced in 2019 and still pending before the Washington state House of Representatives’ Labor & Workplace Standards Committee, Washington House Bill 1601 (HB1601) would:

  • Impose civil penalties and damages on employers that misclassify employees as independent contractors
  • Allow for the creation of workers’ boards empowered to set minimum pay and other protections in certain industries
  • Expand protections against retaliation in the workplace
  • Allow eligible gig economy workers to opt into portable benefits programs, including health insurance, retirement benefits, paid time off, and any other benefits offered by workers’ chosen benefits providers

The proposal requires gig employers like Lyft and TaskRabbit to contribute the lesser of $1 for each worker-hour or 5% of the total transaction charge paid by consumers. It also requires each covered employer to provide adequate workers’ compensation insurance.

HB1601’s fate is up in the air. While it failed to clear the Labor & Workplace Standards Committee in 2019, it was reintroduced without amendment in 2020, and passage remains possible.

Final Word

The new novel coronavirus outbreak of 2019, aka COVID-19, produced a powerful tailwind for advocates of portable health insurance benefits and paid leave for gig workers and part-time employees without health insurance benefits. Several states, including California and New York, have enacted or proposed substantial labor protections for independent contractors. More are likely to follow. While they’re far from universal in coverage or perfect in execution, these protections provide essential peace of mind for lower-earning workers who can’t afford to take a sick day — or have reason to worry whether their jobs will wait for them to return.

Do you live in a state or locality that mandates job protections or benefits for gig economy workers? Would you consider earning income in the gig economy with a better safety net in place?

Source link

Comments (No)

Leave a Reply