Will Crypto Laws Devastate the Industry or Help It Grow Stronger? | by SatoshiLabs | Jan, 2021


Over the last five years especially, countries have started to issue reactive legislation against these perceived threats to individual consumers and the global economy alike. These included one-off guidances, or quickly assembled regulations, generously borrowing on lessons learned in regulating the financial markets in the previous decades. Examples include enforcing Know-Your-Customer procedures, or binding Bitcoin under the legal classification of a security.

The above has so far constituted very entry level regulations, barely scratching the surface of the rapidly expanding, global ecosystem. In the most recent years, however, countries have been catching up with the market and tightening their crypto-specific laws with a variety of crafty solutions. When looking for crypto law innovation, we need to look no further than the Pacific island of Japan.

has been an especially pretty shaky one. Its borders were home to some of the biggest and earliest disasters in crypto. It started early with the Mt. Gox scandal in 2014 which saw hackers make off with over $460 Million in BTC. Just four years later, Japan’s local scene would be shaken by yet another crypto exchange disaster, with the robbers this time getting away with over $500 million worth of NEM tokens.

Despite these clear and brutal examples of the vulnerabilities facing VASPs, Japan’s approach remained pragmatic and futuristic. The island has had an almost three-year head start on . Last year, Japanese authorities issued some of its strictest exchange regulation to date, while at the same time adding extra customer protection.

In order to prevent future customer harm in the vein of Mt. Gox or CoinCheck, local exchanges will have to . This means that, whatever may happen to an upstart exchange, it will be forced to always have enough liquidity in order to pay back its users. A move like this is sure to increase trust, add legitimacy, and inherently increase participation in Japan’s crypto scene for the averaging user.

Across the Sea of Japan, another East Asian jurisdiction is getting busy tying up loose ends on its financial regulation. The has had a very close relationship with the sector since the middle of last decade. At the height of the crypto craze in 2017, surveys showed that over a third of the country’s 22 million workers were active investors in cryptocurrencies.

This was a great opportunity for taxation, but also created a regulatory headache with scams and fraud flooding the market.

In order to prevent a similar situation happening again, Korea’s lawmakers responded with a new set of regulations adding tough new requirements for exchanges. An additional set of laws zoned in specifically on keeping track of movement of illicit funds, but also , both registered under the holders’ official name. This proof of address regulation has started to crop up elsewhere, with Dutch crypto holders now obliged to provide proof of ownership of any address they withdraw to.

“Long gone are the days of dismissing the crypto boom as a volatile bubble. Instead, the new approach makes sure we’re ready for global markets, financing and, most importantly, eager investors.”

Even some of the more free market-friendly areas are catching up with blanket regulations. The autonomous region of has long attracted financial players due to its pro-business approach and a liberal regulatory landscape. Some of the top exchanges have historically operated from Hong Kong, and with good reason. So far,, which allowed many service providers to escape scrutiny as long as they could avoid their assets being officially classified as a security or a future.

This is all about to change in 2021, as . From now on, all trading platforms operating in Hong Kong will be required to apply for a license with the regulatory bodies. The move doesn’t necessarily imply an anti-crypto shift, but a newly found intention of incorporating all aspects of the sector into the mainstream economy of Hong Kong.

The overall motivation so far seems to be focused on bringing the industry into the light, rather than to stifle it completely. This . Despite a recent string of strict regulation on its crypto scene, local ecosystem players have been given , in order to make sure that the local market is allowed to go on undisturbed, while undergoing a process of maturity.

Another region making big moves with fostering its local scene while at the time tightening the screws on regulation is hidden deep inside the Persian Gulf. For the last two decades, the local authorities of thehave been busy creating an economy ready for the post-oil world. This included . With digital asset regulation already in place since mid-2018, the local scene has managed to attract a number of international players. While cryptocurrencies as a whole are not fully compliant with Islamic laws, special economic zones like Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) are exempt from the religious doctrine, allowing crypto to thrive and compete on the global scene, undisturbed.

As far as industries go, cryptocurrencies are a relatively new field with plenty of unrealized potential. With something so complex and futuristic, some crucial issues arise. One of these is the breakneck speed with which the industry is developing. When you combine billions of dollars poured into software and product development with the interconnected, knowledge-sharing nature of the open-source community, even the most centralized, authoritarian regimes are only now catching up to developments in the scene that took place years ago.

TheUSA, for example, has been. Local lawmakers are just now dealing with major crypto incidents from 2018 like Telegram’s infamous ICO launch. Ripple’s CEO recently announced that the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) is suing the company over a suspected fraudulent sale of XRP tokens over a staggering, seven-year period.

But that hasn’t stopped the SEC from fast-tracking other regulations it has deemed as more important, with strict anti-money laundering rules applying to all VASPs as of mid-2020. From last year, all exchanges will be required to collect the names of both transaction senders and receivers, as well as national IDs of the former.

What does the above tell us? Free markets of all sizes and cultures are getting busy bringing the industry into the mainstream, though not all are aligned in their approach. The new motivation is clear. Long gone are the days of dismissing the crypto boom as a volatile bubble. Instead, the new approach is, for better or worse, making sure we’re ready for global markets, financing and, most importantly, eager investors.

Still, . The industry has long moved past ICOs and ERC20 tokens as main points of conversation. The latest FinCEN (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network) crypto regulation has so far attracted over 70,000 comments from the industry, though many have been removed since with little transparency as to why.

Many questions remain, and most governments are struggling to answer them: How do we regulate the variety of tokens and protocols that have developed since 2017? Which parts of the industry should be allowed to thrive and which need to fail? And what institutions should be responsible for making these decisions? Stay tuned for this and much more in next week’s blog post.





Source link

Comments (No)

Leave a Reply